In a move that underscores its commitment to user privacy, Mozilla has decided to end its partnership with Onerep. This decision was propelled by revelations about the company’s CEO’s involvement with a data brokerage. Initially uncovered by Krebs on Security, this development highlights the complexities of navigating privacy assurances in the digital age. Here’s what you need to know about this significant shift and its implications for users.
A partnership under scrutiny
In February, Mozilla took a bold step towards enhancing user privacy by integrating Onerep’s data removal service into its Monitor Plus subscription, priced at US$8.99 monthly. This service promised users an effective tool to locate and request the removal of their personal information across many websites, a process facilitated through Mozilla’s collaboration with Onerep.
However, the partnership faced immediate scrutiny after an in-depth investigation by Krebs on Security revealed that Dimitri Shelest, the CEO of Onerep, had founded numerous people-search websites over the years. Adding to the controversy, Shelest acknowledged retaining an ownership stake in Nuwber, a platform enabling people to search via name, phone number, address, or email. However, he assured me there was no information sharing between Nuwber and Onerep.
Mozilla’s response and plans
Responding to the revelations, Mozilla’s vice president of communications, Brandon Borrman, emphasised that while user data remained secure, the “outside financial interests and activities of Onerepโs CEO do not align with our values.” Mozilla’s swift action to dissolve the partnership with Onerep reflects its unwavering dedication to privacy and transparency, setting a precedent for how tech companies might navigate similar challenges.
As Mozilla navigates this transition, Borrman assures users that the organisation is committed to ensuring a smooth shift to alternative solutions prioritising user privacy. Although details of a replacement service or the future of the Monitor Plus subscription remain unspecified, Mozilla focuses squarely on user interests and privacy protection.
The broader context
This situation highlights the intricate web of interests and ethical considerations that tech companies must navigate to protect user privacy. Shelest’s admission and subsequent defence of his involvement in people-search businesses offer a rare glimpse into the challenges and compromises inherent in the digital privacy landscape.
As the conversation around digital privacy evolves, Mozilla’s decisive action is a critical reminder to align business practices with privacy values. For users, this development underscores the importance of remaining vigilant and informed about the privacy policies of the services they rely on.
