Meta has officially ended its use of fact-checkers in the United States, a decision that will take full effect on Monday, June 10. Joel Kaplan, Metaโs Chief Global Affairs Officer, confirmed the move, which marks a major shift in the companyโs approach to content moderation.
By Monday afternoon, our fact-checking program in the US will be officially over. That means no new fact checks and no fact checkers. We announced in January weโd be winding down the program & removing penalties. In place of fact checks, the first Community Notes will startโฆ
— Joel Kaplan (@joel_kaplan) April 4, 2025
This change was first announced in January, alongside other updates that relaxed the companyโs rules around harmful or misleading content. At the time, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg framed the decision as part of a broader effort to prioritise โfree speech.โ However, the move has drawn concern from critics who worry that it may open the door to more misinformation and harm to vulnerable communities.
A shift in approach to speech and moderation
Metaโs latest changes come at a politically sensitive time. When the updates were introduced earlier this year, Zuckerberg had just donated US$1 million to former President Donald Trumpโs inauguration fund and attended the event. Not long after, he appointed Dana WhiteโCEO of UFC and a known Trump supporterโto Metaโs board of directors.
In a video statement, Zuckerberg described the recent election cycle as a โcultural tipping pointโ for freedom of speech. He argued that it was time to refocus on allowing open conversations, even if the topics were controversial.
However, some of Metaโs updated policies have raised eyebrows. According to the companyโs hateful conduct policy, Meta now permits users to claim someone has a mental illness or abnormality based on their gender or sexual orientation. The platform justifies this as being part of โpolitical and religious discourseโ on topics like transgender identity and homosexuality.
Fact-checking replaced by community notes
Instead of professional fact-checkers, Meta is now adopting a community-based system similar to โCommunity Notesโ used on Elon Muskโs platform, X (formerly Twitter). This new system relies on users to add context to potentially misleading posts across Facebook, Instagram, and Threads.
By Monday afternoon, our fact-checking program in the US will be officially over. That means no new fact checks and no fact checkers. We announced in January weโd be winding down the program & removing penalties. In place of fact checks, the first Community Notes will startโฆ
— Joel Kaplan (@joel_kaplan) April 4, 2025
While this approach may help surface additional information, experts say it is far less effective alone. Professional fact-checkers typically work quickly and with clear standards, helping platforms control the spread of false information. With their removal, critics say, the spread of fake news could worsen.
Metaโs decision to step away from fact-checking appears to align with its business interests. The less moderation there is, the more content can circulate. Since Metaโs platforms use algorithms that prioritise posts that get strong reactionsโwhether positive or negativeโmore controversial or misleading posts are likely to get more attention.
The rise in misinformation is already visible
Since Meta began scaling back its fact-checking efforts earlier this year, there has already been a rise in false claims spreading across its platforms. One example involves a fake story that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would pay US$750 to individuals who report undocumented immigrants. The rumour went viral and was shared widely before being debunked.
The person behind that post welcomed Metaโs policy changes, telling investigative outlet ProPublica that the end of fact-checking was โgreat information.โ
In January, Kaplan summarised the companyโs new direction as follows: โWeโre getting rid of several restrictions on immigration, gender identity, and gender that are the subject of frequent political discourse and debate. Itโs not right that things can be said on TV or the floor of Congress but not on our platforms.โ
As of this week, Meta no longer has any fact-checkers operating in the U.S. The move signals a new chapter for the tech giantโone focused on letting users decide whatโs true rather than relying on experts to guide the way.
