Wednesday, 2 April 2025
26.8 C
Singapore
29 C
Thailand
20 C
Indonesia
26.6 C
Philippines

Google to face a class action lawsuit over Chrome’s data collection practices

Google faces a class action lawsuit over Chrome's data collection, with a court ordering a review of user consent.

Google is now facing a class action lawsuit, alleging that it collected users’ data through its Chrome browser without obtaining proper consent. On Tuesday, a federal appeals court reversed a December 2022 ruling that had previously dismissed the case. The court determined that the lower court had failed to evaluate Google’s disclosures correctly and whether a reasonable user would believe they were consenting to data collection by using the browser.

The allegations against Google

Initially filed in 2020, the class action lawsuit alleges that Google unlawfully gathered data from Chrome users, even if they had not enabled Chrome sync. Chrome’s sync feature is designed to save bookmarks, passwords, open tabs, and other data to your Google account, allowing you to access this information across multiple devices when signed into Chrome.

However, the plaintiffs in this case argue that Google collected far more data than users knew. According to the lawsuit, Chrome “intentionally and unlawfully” sent Google users’ browsing history, IP addresses, persistent cookie identifiers, and unique browser identifiers without obtaining explicit permission from users. The plaintiffs argue that this constitutes a violation of user privacy, as they were not fully aware of the data being collected or how it was being used.

Conversely, Google has maintained that users consented to this data collection by accepting the company’s privacy policy. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who initially dismissed the case, supported this view, stating that Google had adequately disclosed its data collection practices and that the plaintiffs had consented by agreeing to the terms.

The court’s reconsideration

Despite the initial dismissal, the appeals court, led by Judge Milan D. Smith Jr., ruled that the case should be reconsidered. Judge Smith noted that the previous ruling did not fully consider whether users understood the implications of agreeing to Google’s privacy policy. He pointed out that while Google did have a general privacy disclosure, the company also promoted Chrome in a way that could lead users to believe that certain information would not be sent to Google unless they had explicitly enabled Chrome sync.

According to Judge Smith, this discrepancy warranted a closer examination of Google’s disclosures and whether they were sufficiently clear for users to make an informed decision about their data. As a result, the case will now be sent back to the lower courts for further review, where the arguments and evidence will be reconsidered.

Google’s response

Google has expressed disagreement with the appeals court’s decision. Google spokesperson José Castañeda said, “We disagree with this ruling and are confident the facts of the case are on our side. Chrome Sync helps people use Chrome seamlessly across their devices and has clear privacy controls.”

Castañeda also pointed out that Google will soon make changes that no longer require users to enable Chrome sync to access saved information. However, he emphasised that these changes are unrelated to the ongoing litigation. The lawsuit’s outcome could have significant implications for how tech companies disclose their data collection practices and the level of transparency required to ensure user consent.

This case highlights the ongoing debate over user privacy and tech companies’ responsibilities to be transparent about their data collection practices. As the case returns to the lower courts, it will be closely watched by both privacy advocates and the tech industry.

Hot this week

Mobvista’s XMP and AdsPolar recognised as Meta AdTech Business Partners

Mobvista’s XMP and AdsPolar gain Meta AdTech Partner status, giving users early access to tools, insights, and expert campaign support.

Fujifilm unveils GFX100RF: A 102MP medium format compact camera

Fujifilm announces the GFX100RF, a 102MP medium-format compact camera. It is available for pre-order at S$7,999, and early buyers will receive free gifts.

Fitbit users now have until 2026 to migrate to Google accounts

Fitbit users now have until February 2, 2026, to migrate their accounts to Google accounts or risk losing their data and service access.

OpenAI introduces powerful new image-creation features

OpenAI upgrades ChatGPT with GPT-4o, allowing advanced image generation and editing. The update enhances accuracy while addressing copyright concerns.

Sony unveils WF-C710N earbuds with improved battery life and noise cancellation

Sony announces the WF-C710N earbuds, which offer better battery life and noise cancellation, and new colours for the WH-CH720N and WH-CH520 headphones.

These robot vacuums are getting smarter with Apple Home support

Apple’s iOS 18.4 update adds Matter support for robot vacuums, enabling control via Apple Home. Roborock, iRobot, and Ecovacs are updating their devices.

Gmail introduces easier encryption for business emails

Google introduces a new encryption model for Gmail, making it easier for businesses to send secure emails without special software or certificates.

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro review: A mid-range marvel with standout zoom

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro blends standout design, powerful zoom camera, and smart features, making it a top choice in the mid-range segment.

Vivo challenges iPhone 16 Pro Max with X200 Ultra’s video stability

Vivo’s X200 Ultra teaser compares video stability with the iPhone 16 Pro Max, promising top-tier camera upgrades and advanced stabilisation.

Related Articles